Ai: ARtificial Ignorance or intelligenCE?

My experience with AI, whether it’s Rufus, Siri or another, there are times when the AI simply is less than honest and rarely accurate. It doesn’t tell outright lies. Rather, AI often gives not accurate answers.
Example: recently I went on a popular website to see the price of egg powder and was told the can had 72 servings, which I discovered on a different website this was equal to 72 large eggs or 6 dozen.
At $65/can, rounded, that’s a little over $10 per dozen.
When I asked AI as in Artificial Idiot, if the cost of 72 servings or 72 large eggs was $65+ was I not paying over $10 for a dozen eggs? I was told repeatedly, no matter how I worded it, there were 72 servings in the can.
Clearly this AI did not comprehend. Therefore, I conclude, in this scenario, AI did not stand for Artificial Intelligence rather it was Artificial Ignorance.
What this means for writers, those who use AI occasionally, one must be very cautious regarding what their AI suggests, no matter how one words a request.  
​Another example, when it comes to images.
When given the description of a woman in a white low cut gown that clings, the image was of a female with luxury curves, full breasts in a white gown that hung seductively to her curves, and I mean very seductively. 
Now, when I’ve asked for that sort of image in the past because I wanted the female to appear seductive, I was told that violated their guidelines. Even when a husband and wife (in my story) had just given birth to a baby, and the father’s hand reached out to touch the child’s cheek, I was told that was inappropriate and could not be created because it violated guidelines. It was as if touching the child was considered pedophilic behavior, or so it seemed.
The outcome of all this is, I prefer not to use AI because the humans who design the programs seem to be lacking in common sense. After all, AI idiot, intelligent or whatever you call it, only can do what humans program it to do.